Counter Cyclical Program in Clinton County, New York, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 222
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Clinton County, New York totaled $1,120,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Michael Boulerice | Mooers, NY 12958 | $1,322 |
122 | Paul Premo | Churubusco, NY 12923 | $1,305 |
123 | Daniel Fortin | Ellenburg Center, NY 12934 | $1,275 |
124 | Kevin Carpenter | Ellenburg Center, NY 12934 | $1,273 |
125 | Melinda Carpenter | Ellenburg Center, NY 12934 | $1,273 |
126 | Darryl Moschelle | Plattsburgh, NY 12901 | $1,251 |
127 | Walter J Trombley | Ellenburg Center, NY 12934 | $1,243 |
128 | Robert Gravelle | Chazy, NY 12921 | $1,180 |
129 | Herbert King | West Chazy, NY 12992 | $1,134 |
130 | Larry Rabideau | Mooers Forks, NY 12959 | $1,102 |
131 | Gerald Nichols | Churubusco, NY 12923 | $1,088 |
132 | James Sample | Ellenburg Center, NY 12934 | $1,062 |
133 | Kyle Castine | Champlain, NY 12919 | $1,046 |
134 | Edward Mayo | Chazy, NY 12921 | $1,029 |
135 | Charles M Arthur | Peru, NY 12972 | $1,022 |
136 | Carlton Kelley | West Chazy, NY 12992 | $1,022 |
137 | Michael Perrin | Ellenburg Depot, NY 12935 | $1,009 |
138 | George Black | Rouses Point, NY 12979 | $1,006 |
139 | Helen Jean Wilcox | Ellenburg Depot, NY 12935 | $1,004 |
140 | Alvin Wilcox | Ellenburg Depot, NY 12935 | $1,004 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”