Market Loss Assistance Program in Clinton County, New York, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 354
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Clinton County, New York totaled $3,912,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Leeward Babbie | Peru, NY 12972 | $34,512 |
22 | Charles Bubbins | Plattsburgh, NY 12901 | $34,512 |
23 | William Ashley | West Chazy, NY 12992 | $34,512 |
24 | William K Ashline | Plattsburgh, NY 12901 | $34,512 |
25 | Remillard Farms LLC | Peru, NY 12972 | $34,512 |
26 | Gerald Dumas | West Chazy, NY 12992 | $33,448 |
27 | Donald Dimock | Peru, NY 12972 | $33,203 |
28 | Lafountain Brothers | Mooers Forks, NY 12959 | $32,998 |
29 | Larry Ashline | Mooers Forks, NY 12959 | $30,230 |
30 | Clearfield Farm | Plattsburgh, NY 12901 | $30,105 |
31 | G & M Farms | Plattsburgh, NY 12901 | $29,626 |
32 | The William H Miner Agricultural Research Institut | Chazy, NY 12921 | $28,850 |
33 | Lamberton Farms | Mooers Forks, NY 12959 | $27,507 |
34 | Hill-lee Acres | Peru, NY 12972 | $27,468 |
35 | Craig Lapier | Plattsburgh, NY 12901 | $27,089 |
36 | B & R Dairy Inc | Chazy, NY 12921 | $26,356 |
37 | Chester Thew | Peru, NY 12972 | $25,218 |
38 | Jack Reed | West Chazy, NY 12992 | $23,349 |
39 | Felix Tetreault | Champlain, NY 12919 | $23,240 |
40 | Marshall Ducharme | West Chazy, NY 12992 | $23,221 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”