Market Loss Assistance Program in Columbia County, New York, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 151
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Columbia County, New York totaled $2,352,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Odyssey Farm South Inc | Claverack, NY 12513 | $125,703 |
2 | David Rockefeller | Hudson, NY 12534 | $107,480 |
3 | Bartel Farms | Old Forge, NY 13420 | $104,002 |
4 | Wil-roc Farm | Kinderhook, NY 12106 | $103,630 |
5 | George A Gibson | Schodack Landing, NY 12156 | $90,806 |
6 | J & J Mill Creek Farm Inc | Stuyvesant, NY 12173 | $82,293 |
7 | V R Saulpaugh & Sons | Germantown, NY 12526 | $57,391 |
8 | Christopher A. Bortugno & Sons | Stuyvesant Falls, NY 12174 | $56,861 |
9 | Sunny Mead Farms Inc | Hillsdale, NY 12529 | $56,706 |
10 | Donald A Marsh Estate | Kinderhook, NY 12106 | $53,217 |
11 | Millerhurst Farm | Ancramdale, NY 12503 | $49,853 |
12 | Hess Brothers | Hudson, NY 12534 | $46,207 |
13 | Lynn F Main Jr | Copake Falls, NY 12517 | $44,020 |
14 | Lo-nan Farms LLC | Pine Plains, NY 12567 | $43,849 |
15 | Rothdale Farms Partnership | Ancramdale, NY 12503 | $42,687 |
16 | Langdon Hurst Farms | Copake, NY 12516 | $40,134 |
17 | Paul C Chittenden | Schodack Landing, NY 12156 | $39,610 |
18 | Dan Ray Farm | Hudson, NY 12534 | $34,936 |
19 | Karl B Chittenden | New Lebanon, NY 12125 | $34,512 |
20 | Arend Ooms & Sons | Valatie, NY 12184 | $34,512 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>