Farm Subsidy information
Columbia County, New York
Total Subsidies in Columbia County, New York, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 472
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Columbia County, New York totaled $64,415,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Paul C Chittenden | Schodack Landing, NY 12156 | $80,203 |
102 | Dencinjo Farm | Ancram, NY 12502 | $79,902 |
103 | John R Conklin | Pine Plains, NY 12567 | $79,506 |
104 | Mountain Brook Farm Inc | Ancram, NY 12502 | $76,810 |
105 | Howard M Smith | Hudson, NY 12534 | $74,765 |
106 | George Atkinson | Hudson, NY 12534 | $74,481 |
107 | H Rothvoss & Sons Inc | Ancramdale, NY 12503 | $74,440 |
108 | F Robert Brew Sr | Hudson, NY 12534 | $74,422 |
109 | Diehl Bros | Germantown, NY 12526 | $74,174 |
110 | John E Dow Dba Dow Farms | Pittsfield, MA 01201 | $70,872 |
111 | Trowbridge Farm Inc | Ghent, NY 12075 | $70,595 |
112 | Dodds Dairy LLC | Hillsdale, NY 12529 | $69,144 |
113 | Glenn Goodwin Jr | Valatie, NY 12184 | $68,941 |
114 | Scott & Theresa LLC | Hudson, NY 12534 | $68,049 |
115 | John & Peter Hotaling D/b/a Clove | Claverack, NY 12513 | $67,786 |
116 | Dean H Pierson | Copake, NY 12516 | $66,052 |
117 | Roxbury Farm Csa, LLC | Kinderhook, NY 12106 | $65,799 |
118 | Potts Farm | Germantown, NY 12526 | $64,837 |
119 | The Berry Farm | Valatie, NY 12184 | $62,773 |
120 | Joseph Jutkofsky Jr | Ancram, NY 12502 | $61,148 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”