Production Flexibility Program in Dutchess County, New York, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 109
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Dutchess County, New York totaled $1,213,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Greig Farm | Red Hook, NY 12571 | $2,133 |
82 | Stephen & Robert Kondas | Pleasant Valley, NY 12569 | $2,094 |
83 | Warren M Wigsten | Pleasant Valley, NY 12569 | $2,089 |
84 | John R Conklin | Pine Plains, NY 12567 | $2,050 |
85 | Steve Kondas | Pleasant Valley, NY 12569 | $1,968 |
86 | Alda Graham | Millerton, NY 12546 | $1,897 |
87 | H & J Schroeder | Millerton, NY 12546 | $1,886 |
88 | Harrison Dickson | Verbank, NY 12585 | $1,728 |
89 | Clifford P Porter | Pleasant Valley, NY 12569 | $1,231 |
90 | Seelbach Farms Inc | Staatsburg, NY 12580 | $1,229 |
91 | Elizabeth Baldwin | Millbrook, NY 12545 | $1,150 |
92 | David Melville | Hyde Park, NY 12538 | $1,111 |
93 | Mead Orchards, LLC | Tivoli, NY 12583 | $1,065 |
94 | Michael W Lawrence | Amenia, NY 12501 | $910 |
95 | Paul Spoerri | Stanfordville, NY 12581 | $908 |
96 | Herbert Cole | Lagrangeville, NY 12540 | $893 |
97 | Laufred Farms | Stanfordville, NY 12581 | $659 |
98 | Angelo Orsetti Jr | Hopewell Junction, NY 12533 | $594 |
99 | William Chorney | Poughkeepsie, NY 12603 | $570 |
100 | Henry G Arnold | West Granby, CT 06090 | $473 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”