Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Franklin County, New York, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 127
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Franklin County, New York totaled $1,663,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Papas Dairy LLC | North Bangor, NY 12966 | $260,937 |
2 | Trainer Farm LLC | Chateaugay, NY 12920 | $101,566 |
3 | Carsada Dairy LLC | Malone, NY 12953 | $92,605 |
4 | Metcalf Farms LLC | Constable, NY 12926 | $70,907 |
5 | Monica Farms LLC | North Bangor, NY 12966 | $69,186 |
6 | Dans Dairy LLC | Fort Covington, NY 12937 | $67,442 |
7 | Richard Eakins Dba Norco Farms | Hopkinton, NY 12965 | $59,438 |
8 | Stargo Dairy Farm LLC | Malone, NY 12953 | $58,388 |
9 | Donald Ellsworth | Fort Covington, NY 12937 | $46,366 |
10 | Logue Farms Inc | Woodbury, CT 06798 | $41,430 |
11 | Shipman Farms LLC | Burke, NY 12917 | $38,557 |
12 | Dennis Egan | North Bangor, NY 12966 | $36,950 |
13 | Vincent Farms LLC | Malone, NY 12953 | $36,324 |
14 | Alain Choiniere | North Bangor, NY 12966 | $35,573 |
15 | Wood Dairy Farm | Chateaugay, NY 12920 | $35,488 |
16 | Donald C Dana | Moira, NY 12957 | $34,180 |
17 | Harrigan Brothers Dairy Farm | Chateaugay, NY 12920 | $32,543 |
18 | Mr Randall Ooms | Constable, NY 12926 | $32,261 |
19 | Whites Dairy Farms LLC | North Bangor, NY 12966 | $29,193 |
20 | Burkeside Farm Inc | Burke, NY 12917 | $25,614 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>