Farm Subsidy information
Franklin County, New York
Total Subsidies in Franklin County, New York, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 861
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Franklin County, New York totaled $51,182,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Jimali Holsteins | North Bangor, NY 12966 | $357,896 |
22 | Tom Ed Matt Dan Garland Patrners | Malone, NY 12953 | $357,774 |
23 | Gerald T Oakes Jr | Bombay, NY 12914 | $357,107 |
24 | Frederick I Tuttle | North Bangor, NY 12966 | $353,912 |
25 | Korin J Oakes | Bombay, NY 12914 | $317,926 |
26 | Eugene M Poirier | North Bangor, NY 12966 | $303,077 |
27 | Burkeside Farm Inc | Burke, NY 12917 | $285,863 |
28 | Charles Scott | Constable, NY 12926 | $277,886 |
29 | Thomas Armstrong | Constable, NY 12926 | $273,843 |
30 | Al Miller | Constable, NY 12926 | $267,966 |
31 | Gary P Monica | North Bangor, NY 12966 | $267,472 |
32 | Paul J Mitchell Logging Inc | Tupper Lake, NY 12986 | $263,190 |
33 | Jean Louis Choiniere | Malone, NY 12953 | $254,729 |
34 | Brandon J Donahue | Malone, NY 12953 | $251,809 |
35 | Scott E Hamilton | Malone, NY 12953 | $249,385 |
36 | Dennis Reardon | Bombay, NY 12914 | $248,429 |
37 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $238,123 |
38 | Allan Peck | Burke, NY 12917 | $232,213 |
39 | Allan Friend | Burke, NY 12917 | $230,901 |
40 | Keith Peterson | Burke, NY 12917 | $229,881 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”