Margin Protection Program in Franklin County, New York, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 55
Recipients of Margin Protection Program from farms in Franklin County, New York totaled $560,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Margin Protection Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Metcalf Farms LLC | Constable, NY 12926 | $29,810 |
2 | Monica Farms LLC | North Bangor, NY 12966 | $29,745 |
3 | Shipman Farms LLC | Burke, NY 12917 | $29,557 |
4 | Donald Ellsworth | Fort Covington, NY 12937 | $28,669 |
5 | Sunset Lake Farm No 2 LLC | South Burlington, VT 05403 | $28,548 |
6 | Mr Randall Ooms | Constable, NY 12926 | $28,028 |
7 | Brockway Hilltop Farms LLC | Fort Covington, NY 12937 | $27,753 |
8 | Stargo Dairy Farm LLC | Malone, NY 12953 | $27,386 |
9 | Dans Dairy LLC | Fort Covington, NY 12937 | $27,094 |
10 | Donald C Dana | Moira, NY 12957 | $23,973 |
11 | Glengarry Farms LLC | Burke, NY 12917 | $15,292 |
12 | Dennis Reardon | Bombay, NY 12914 | $13,798 |
13 | Woodworth Farms LLC | Constable, NY 12926 | $10,114 |
14 | Eugene M Poirier | North Bangor, NY 12966 | $10,096 |
15 | Scott E Hamilton | Malone, NY 12953 | $9,211 |
16 | Keith Peterson | Burke, NY 12917 | $9,101 |
17 | Thomas Jones | Chateaugay, NY 12920 | $9,019 |
18 | Jean Louis Choiniere | Malone, NY 12953 | $8,782 |
19 | Thomas Armstrong | Constable, NY 12926 | $8,721 |
20 | Burkeside Farm Inc | Burke, NY 12917 | $8,510 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>