Total Commodity Programs in Herkimer County, New York, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 976
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Herkimer County, New York totaled $45,001,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Daniel Tinkler | Little Falls, NY 13365 | $109,634 |
102 | Thomas G Farnell | Little Falls, NY 13365 | $109,332 |
103 | George Demeree | Little Falls, NY 13365 | $108,772 |
104 | Matthew Adam Surawski | Auburn, NY 13021 | $108,422 |
105 | Curtin Dairy Lp | Cassville, NY 13318 | $108,001 |
106 | Thomas N Worobey | Jordanville, NY 13361 | $107,731 |
107 | Joseph Kenyon Sr | Mohawk, NY 13407 | $107,281 |
108 | Lawrence D Marosek | Little Falls, NY 13365 | $102,742 |
109 | Karl Gebhardt | Fort Plain, NY 13339 | $102,701 |
110 | Matthew And Thomas Helmer | Newport, NY 13416 | $101,303 |
111 | Cedar Knoll Farm | Fort Plain, NY 13339 | $100,527 |
112 | M & M Farms | Richfield Springs, NY 13439 | $98,352 |
113 | Timmerman Grain Farms LLC | Little Falls, NY 13365 | $96,713 |
114 | Carlton M Mckenney | Little Falls, NY 13365 | $95,922 |
115 | Nicastro Farms Inc | Frankfort, NY 13340 | $94,886 |
116 | Scott Stack | Little Falls, NY 13365 | $94,334 |
117 | Harold Comstock | Little Falls, NY 13365 | $93,733 |
118 | John Diaz | Poland, NY 13431 | $92,427 |
119 | Windex Farms | Frankfort, NY 13340 | $90,284 |
120 | Aeschlimann Farms, LLC | Frankfort, NY 13340 | $88,607 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”