Production Flexibility Program in Madison County, New York, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 291
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Madison County, New York totaled $2,711,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Cedar Knob Farm | Munnsville, NY 13409 | $20,655 |
42 | Ronald Bono | Bouckville, NY 13310 | $20,230 |
43 | Deer Valley Farms | Hamilton, NY 13346 | $20,120 |
44 | Charles Berry Estate | Canastota, NY 13032 | $18,595 |
45 | Retso Stock Farms Inc | Canastota, NY 13032 | $18,464 |
46 | William Wester | Cazenovia, NY 13035 | $18,201 |
47 | Peter Prendergast | Cazenovia, NY 13035 | $17,891 |
48 | Millbrook Farm Hubbardsville LLC | Hubbardsville, NY 13355 | $17,492 |
49 | C Terrance Wilcox | Hamilton, NY 13346 | $16,500 |
50 | Steven & Douglas Durfee | Chittenango, NY 13037 | $16,266 |
51 | Longview Ridge Farm Inc | Erieville, NY 13061 | $15,356 |
52 | Timothy Devine | Canastota, NY 13032 | $14,649 |
53 | Weisbrod Crop Farms LLC | Canastota, NY 13032 | $14,204 |
54 | Steven Durfee | Chittenango, NY 13037 | $14,195 |
55 | Weisbrod Crop Farm LLC | Canastota, NY 13032 | $13,741 |
56 | Samuel Campbell | Earlville, NY 13332 | $13,689 |
57 | Lawrence Nelson Wedge Jr | Earlville, NY 13332 | $13,497 |
58 | Martin Farms LLC | Cazenovia, NY 13035 | $13,492 |
59 | Daniel R Skramko | Eaton, NY 13334 | $13,374 |
60 | K&w Dairy Farm Inc | Chittenango, NY 13037 | $13,029 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”