Total Commodity Programs in Madison County, New York, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 971
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Madison County, New York totaled $62,661,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Tuscarora Dairy, LLC | Chittenango, NY 13037 | $2,279,841 |
2 | White Eagle Farms LLC | Hamilton, NY 13346 | $1,788,196 |
3 | Holmes-acre LLC | New Woodstock, NY 13122 | $1,312,803 |
4 | Quiet Valley LLC | Oneida, NY 13421 | $1,194,337 |
5 | Springwater Farms LLC | Canastota, NY 13032 | $1,135,146 |
6 | Cedar Knob Farms LLC | Munnsville, NY 13409 | $1,088,395 |
7 | Monanfran Farms Inc | Canastota, NY 13032 | $966,508 |
8 | My-bar-k Meadows LLC | Munnsville, NY 13409 | $852,799 |
9 | Woodstead Farms LLC | De Ruyter, NY 13052 | $852,477 |
10 | Barney G Prince | Hamilton, NY 13346 | $836,850 |
11 | Blue Hill Farm LLC | Morrisville, NY 13408 | $794,147 |
12 | Otis Marshall Farms Inc | Munnsville, NY 13409 | $744,261 |
13 | Fuess Acres II | Madison, NY 13402 | $736,588 |
14 | Charles Roberts & Sons | Canastota, NY 13032 | $637,955 |
15 | Efs LLC | Hamilton, NY 13346 | $601,176 |
16 | Heim Farms, LLC | Morrisville, NY 13408 | $581,239 |
17 | Brink Family Farm, LLC | New Woodstock, NY 13122 | $545,335 |
18 | Rend-cach Farm, LLC | Earlville, NY 13332 | $531,783 |
19 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $514,580 |
20 | Darryl Crumb | Hubbardsville, NY 13355 | $501,279 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>