Deficiency Payment in Montgomery County, New York, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 184
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Montgomery County, New York totaled $469,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Devendorf Farm | Amsterdam, NY 12010 | $3,642 |
42 | David W Sanford | Johnstown, NY 12095 | $3,627 |
43 | Pamela Kelley | Saint Johnsville, NY 13452 | $3,345 |
44 | Leo & Harry Przybylo | Amsterdam, NY 12010 | $3,248 |
45 | Jonathan R Gould | Fort Plain, NY 13339 | $3,109 |
46 | Henry E Steiger | Amsterdam, NY 12010 | $3,063 |
47 | Not This Bellinger Jr | Fultonville, NY 12072 | $3,019 |
48 | Glen Meadows Farm | Fultonville, NY 12072 | $2,882 |
49 | Victor E Darrach | Saint Johnsville, NY 13452 | $2,839 |
50 | Larry J Fox | Fonda, NY 12068 | $2,794 |
51 | Gilbert George Soodal | Amsterdam, NY 12010 | $2,759 |
52 | Hutchison Brothers | Amsterdam, NY 12010 | $2,732 |
53 | Howard Yurkewecz | Fultonville, NY 12072 | $2,719 |
54 | John H Mcginnis | Newark, DE 19702 | $2,716 |
55 | Jacob Sammons | Fonda, NY 12068 | $2,704 |
56 | Scott Kent | Palatine Bridge, NY 13428 | $2,605 |
57 | Jonker Farms | Palatine Bridge, NY 13428 | $2,415 |
58 | Aucompaugh Acres Inc | Pattersonville, NY 12137 | $2,385 |
59 | John Seyfried Jr | Fort Johnson, NY 12070 | $2,279 |
60 | Ralph G Thomas | Canajoharie, NY 13317 | $2,274 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”