Deficiency Payment in Niagara County, New York, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 297
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Niagara County, New York totaled $1,022,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Floyd D Snyder | Lockport, NY 14094 | $10,784 |
22 | Voelpel Farms | Newfane, NY 14108 | $10,678 |
23 | Reuben Haseley Farms | Niagara Falls, NY 14304 | $10,559 |
24 | Waters Brothers Dairy | Middleport, NY 14105 | $10,448 |
25 | Atwater Farms | Barker, NY 14012 | $8,912 |
26 | Haseley Brothers Farm | Sanborn, NY 14132 | $8,858 |
27 | Louise E Mangan | Niagara Falls, NY 14305 | $8,572 |
28 | Niagara View Farms Wrong Id | Niagara Falls, NY 14304 | $8,410 |
29 | B Weil And Son Inc | Boca Raton, FL 33433 | $8,303 |
30 | Wilbert Milleville | Niagara Falls, NY 14304 | $8,082 |
31 | Milleville Brothers | Sanborn, NY 14132 | $8,080 |
32 | Veri Farms | Gasport, NY 14067 | $7,133 |
33 | Danielewicz Brothers | Sanborn, NY 14132 | $7,104 |
34 | John F Lepard | Middleport, NY 14105 | $6,862 |
35 | Dr David Denzel | Lockport, NY 14094 | $6,824 |
36 | Clifford Vanderwalker | Middleport, NY 14105 | $6,695 |
37 | Stahl Dairy Farm | Akron, NY 14001 | $6,570 |
38 | Benjamin Schultz | North Tonawanda, NY 14120 | $6,294 |
39 | Walter Librock | Gasport, NY 14067 | $6,109 |
40 | Mark J Senek | Ransomville, NY 14131 | $6,018 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”