Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Niagara County, New York, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 182
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Niagara County, New York totaled $6,843,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Blackman Homestead Farm | Lockport, NY 14094 | $5,443 |
122 | Dale Graham | Newfane, NY 14108 | $5,429 |
123 | Paul Bedford | Lockport, NY 14094 | $5,354 |
124 | William Andrews | Wilson, NY 14172 | $5,327 |
125 | Ronald P Sprout | Middleport, NY 14105 | $5,232 |
126 | Bruce E Weinheimer | North Tonawanda, NY 14120 | $5,111 |
127 | Ronald A Grell | Middleport, NY 14105 | $4,780 |
128 | Greg Aaron | Sanborn, NY 14132 | $4,746 |
129 | Windy Acres/horticulture | Gasport, NY 14067 | $4,714 |
130 | Duane Klumpp | Appleton, NY 14008 | $4,596 |
131 | John H Keough | Appleton, NY 14008 | $4,486 |
132 | Lakeshore Dairy LLC | Oakfield, NY 14125 | $4,486 |
133 | James C Merrell | Gasport, NY 14067 | $4,330 |
134 | Norman Blosser | Lockport, NY 14094 | $4,306 |
135 | Daniel Halstead | Lockport, NY 14094 | $4,116 |
136 | John Cullen | Gasport, NY 14067 | $4,093 |
137 | Margaret Wagner | Lockport, NY 14094 | $3,800 |
138 | Dan Harbison | Ransomville, NY 14131 | $3,743 |
139 | Chateau Niagara Winery | Newfane, NY 14108 | $3,674 |
140 | Martin Kroening | Sanborn, NY 14132 | $3,673 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”