Farm Subsidy information
Oneida County, New York
Total Subsidies in Oneida County, New York, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 272
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Oneida County, New York totaled $6,625,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Edward Ford | Waterville, NY 13480 | $25,200 |
82 | Mark Thornton | Boonville, NY 13309 | $25,029 |
83 | Mary Stanimer | Clayville, NY 13322 | $24,827 |
84 | Rodney W Southwick | Boonville, NY 13309 | $24,636 |
85 | Jason L Stanimer | Sauquoit, NY 13456 | $24,628 |
86 | Neil Brodock | Blossvale, NY 13308 | $24,534 |
87 | Isaiah Harosia | Taberg, NY 13471 | $24,331 |
88 | Garrie Smith | Westernville, NY 13486 | $23,472 |
89 | Douglas Schallenberg | Ava, NY 13303 | $22,787 |
90 | Joseph J Mihalko | Boonville, NY 13309 | $22,717 |
91 | Robert W Jones | Remsen, NY 13438 | $22,509 |
92 | Jason T Santobuono | Deansboro, NY 13328 | $22,494 |
93 | Wayne Durant | Vernon Center, NY 13477 | $22,443 |
94 | Thomas Williams And Adelbert Williams - Williams S | Durhamville, NY 13054 | $22,346 |
95 | Brett Roberts | Remsen, NY 13438 | $22,344 |
96 | Michael Napierkowski | Boonville, NY 13309 | $21,681 |
97 | Wendell Elliott | Westmoreland, NY 13490 | $21,529 |
98 | Joseph & Barbara Mushala | Cassville, NY 13318 | $20,523 |
99 | James Elliott | Rome, NY 13440 | $20,408 |
100 | Old Mcmarleys Apple Farm | Clinton, NY 13323 | $20,045 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”