Counter Cyclical Program in Ontario County, New York, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 322
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Ontario County, New York totaled $2,703,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Brock Acres Partnership | Canandaigua, NY 14424 | $95,358 |
2 | Will-o-crest Farms Limited Partne | Clifton Springs, NY 14432 | $74,152 |
3 | Rockefeller Farms | Phelps, NY 14532 | $73,976 |
4 | Dean Walt Huff | Bloomfield, NY 14469 | $72,755 |
5 | Hemdale Farms Inc | Seneca Castle, NY 14547 | $57,243 |
6 | Old Fort Farms Carl Blackmer | Livonia, NY 14487 | $55,850 |
7 | Reedland Farms LLC | Clifton Springs, NY 14432 | $54,530 |
8 | Sheldon Farms LLC | Palmyra, NY 14522 | $51,396 |
9 | Bay Farms | Rushville, NY 14544 | $51,074 |
10 | Rodney Brown | Clifton Springs, NY 14432 | $49,376 |
11 | Hickory Lane Farms, LLC | Farmington, NY 14425 | $43,592 |
12 | Lawnhurst Farms | Stanley, NY 14561 | $40,024 |
13 | Duane A Blowers | Hall, NY 14463 | $37,033 |
14 | Bowe Farms Inc | Farmington, NY 14425 | $36,947 |
15 | David Patrick | Geneva, NY 14456 | $36,610 |
16 | Charles A Miller Dba C And D Farms | Canandaigua, NY 14424 | $35,716 |
17 | Hansen Farms LLC | Stanley, NY 14561 | $34,176 |
18 | Richard S Padgham | Farmington, NY 14425 | $33,120 |
19 | Dean H Huff | Bloomfield, NY 14469 | $32,463 |
20 | Walter Decook | Clifton Springs, NY 14432 | $32,411 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>