Conservation Reserve Program in Orange County, New York, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 91
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Orange County, New York totaled $9,459,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | David Shapiro | Port Jervis, NY 12771 | $651,717 |
2 | Dina Shapiro Fried | New York, NY 10022 | $651,717 |
3 | Raymond Myruski | Goshen, NY 10924 | $608,825 |
4 | Pillmeier Produce Farms | Florida, NY 10921 | $569,526 |
5 | Pamela Shapiro | New York, NY 10022 | $529,521 |
6 | Frank Pikul | Florida, NY 10921 | $465,029 |
7 | Pawliczek Farms | Westtown, NY 10998 | $336,353 |
8 | Christopher Madura | Slate Hill, NY 10973 | $310,985 |
9 | Alfred C Schultheis | Tabernacle, NJ 08088 | $288,637 |
10 | Howard Shapiro | Port Jervis, NY 12771 | $281,979 |
11 | Global Country Of World Peace | Bay Shore, NY 11706 | $280,595 |
12 | John D Madura | Pine Island, NY 10969 | $242,635 |
13 | Dagele Bros Produce Co | Florida, NY 10921 | $240,422 |
14 | American Fruits Cordial Corporation | Warwick, NY 10990 | $226,185 |
15 | Gerick Associates LLC | New Hampton, NY 10958 | $214,484 |
16 | Victor E Korycki Jr | Goshen, NY 10924 | $172,419 |
17 | Pierce Produce Farm | New Hampton, NY 10958 | $164,149 |
18 | Eugene Froehlich | Montgomery, NY 12549 | $160,837 |
19 | Walter Bastek | Westtown, NY 10998 | $149,778 |
20 | John Brozdowski | Middletown, NY 10940 | $147,633 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>