Farm Subsidy information
Orange County, New York
Total Subsidies in Orange County, New York, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 787
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Orange County, New York totaled $110,969,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | R & G Produce | Goshen, NY 10924 | $307,773 |
62 | Joseph L Lysack Jr | Warwick, NY 10990 | $304,479 |
63 | Ebs Partners Dba Elvree Farms | Slate Hill, NY 10973 | $298,155 |
64 | Masker Fruit Farms Inc | Warwick, NY 10990 | $297,537 |
65 | Ljm Growers, Inc | Goshen, NY 10924 | $294,254 |
66 | Eugene Froehlich | Montgomery, NY 12549 | $292,031 |
67 | Howard Shapiro | Port Jervis, NY 12771 | $281,979 |
68 | Global Country Of World Peace | Bay Shore, NY 11706 | $281,067 |
69 | Joseph Battiato | Chester, NY 10918 | $279,740 |
70 | Frank M Lichwick Jr | New Hampton, NY 10958 | $274,788 |
71 | Andrew Cavallaro | Goshen, NY 10924 | $273,350 |
72 | Elizabeth A Mikulski | Goshen, NY 10924 | $269,816 |
73 | Jacob Gros | Pine Bush, NY 12566 | $264,105 |
74 | Gregory Yurchuk Jr | Florida, NY 10921 | $262,975 |
75 | Caesar Chan | Pine Island, NY 10969 | $262,506 |
76 | Stanley D Osczepinski Dba S & So | Goshen, NY 10924 | $259,013 |
77 | George E Constable | Unionville, NY 10988 | $258,926 |
78 | Minard Farms Inc | Clintondale, NY 12515 | $254,050 |
79 | Walter Bastek | Westtown, NY 10998 | $252,575 |
80 | H & R Growers Inc | Pine Island, NY 10969 | $251,491 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”