Direct Payment Program in Orange County, New York, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 246
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Orange County, New York totaled $3,103,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Allen P Baird | Warwick, NY 10990 | $6,522 |
102 | F & F Farms | New Hampton, NY 10958 | $6,342 |
103 | James D Miedema | Port Jervis, NY 12771 | $6,245 |
104 | Estate Of Patrick Kelly | Pine Bush, NY 12566 | $6,191 |
105 | Gary Rickard | Honesdale, PA 18431 | $6,183 |
106 | Vellenga Brothers | Middletown, NY 10941 | $6,182 |
107 | William J Bardin | Pine Bush, NY 12566 | $6,096 |
108 | Martin D Smith Jr | Cuddebackville, NY 12729 | $6,028 |
109 | Couser Farm | Pine Bush, NY 12566 | $6,016 |
110 | James E Judson | Bullville, NY 10915 | $5,944 |
111 | Joseph Dimartino | Walden, NY 12586 | $5,895 |
112 | Michael R Moraczewski | Warwick, NY 10990 | $5,859 |
113 | Paul Zwart Dba Zwart Dairy Farms | Walden, NY 12586 | $5,825 |
114 | Louis J Miloszewski Jr | Florida, NY 10921 | $5,792 |
115 | Peter J Ewanciw | Port Jervis, NY 12771 | $5,754 |
116 | Sprucegate Holsteins | Walden, NY 12586 | $5,730 |
117 | Michael Miedema Sr | Middletown, NY 10940 | $5,682 |
118 | Theodore Owens | Montgomery, NY 12549 | $5,545 |
119 | Estate Of John F Mazur | Montgomery, NY 12549 | $5,394 |
120 | Edward Ewanciw | Westtown, NY 10998 | $5,153 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”