Direct Payment Program in Orange County, New York, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 246
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Orange County, New York totaled $3,103,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | James Allen Drake | Westtown, NY 10998 | $3,725 |
142 | Nicholas A Jones | Rock Tavern, NY 12575 | $3,572 |
143 | Martin J Sauer | Campbell Hall, NY 10916 | $3,519 |
144 | Nancy A Rudy | Warwick, NY 10990 | $3,515 |
145 | Douglas Larsen | Pine Bush, NY 12566 | $3,438 |
146 | Eileen Frangione | Westtown, NY 10998 | $3,378 |
147 | Bardin Farm Partnership | Pine Bush, NY 12566 | $3,350 |
148 | Ivan Lewis | Chester, NY 10918 | $3,235 |
149 | Walter Konefal | Pine Bush, NY 12566 | $3,230 |
150 | Raymond Mabee | Warwick, NY 10990 | $3,137 |
151 | David W Hazekamp/hazekamp Family | Jordanville, NY 13361 | $3,066 |
152 | Michael C Miedema Jr | Westtown, NY 10998 | $3,066 |
153 | W Michael Simpson | Port Jervis, NY 12771 | $2,926 |
154 | Indian Acres Dairy | Port Jervis, NY 12771 | $2,926 |
155 | John A Wright Jr | Warwick, NY 10990 | $2,913 |
156 | Estate Of David Cole | New Hampton, NY 10958 | $2,863 |
157 | Richard Blazeski | Pine Bush, NY 12566 | $2,835 |
158 | Bruce R Wittels | Warwick, NY 10990 | $2,789 |
159 | Harold J Cosh | Sussex, NJ 07461 | $2,710 |
160 | Echo Dairy Farm, LLC | Unionville, NY 10988 | $2,675 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”