Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in Orange County, New York, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 152
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in Orange County, New York totaled $566,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Mt Airy Fruit Farm Inc | Newburgh, NY 12550 | $7,000 |
22 | R Kearns Tweddle | Montgomery, NY 12549 | $6,911 |
23 | Hoeffner Farms Inc | Montgomery, NY 12549 | $6,792 |
24 | Randall Doty | Warwick, NY 10990 | $6,766 |
25 | David Ford | Westtown, NY 10998 | $6,705 |
26 | Dagele Bros Produce Co | Florida, NY 10921 | $6,688 |
27 | Cosh Ridge Farms | Unionville, NY 10988 | $6,641 |
28 | Frank Hoeffner | Montgomery, NY 12549 | $6,637 |
29 | Shuback Farms Inc | Goshen, NY 10924 | $6,544 |
30 | Caroline Madura | Goshen, NY 10924 | $6,354 |
31 | Michael Miedema Sr | Middletown, NY 10940 | $6,279 |
32 | John J Ruszkiewicz | Pine Island, NY 10969 | $5,928 |
33 | Frankie's Produce Farms Inc | Florida, NY 10921 | $5,846 |
34 | Robert H Ford | Westtown, NY 10998 | $5,395 |
35 | Robert Stap | Pine Bush, NY 12566 | $5,334 |
36 | Louis J Miloszewski Jr | Florida, NY 10921 | $5,331 |
37 | Musicon Deer Farm Inc | Goshen, NY 10924 | $5,321 |
38 | Crist Bros. Orchards, Inc. | Walden, NY 12586 | $5,312 |
39 | Charles Kuperus | Westtown, NY 10998 | $5,153 |
40 | H & R Growers Inc | Pine Island, NY 10969 | $4,824 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”