Miscellaneous Farm Programs in Orange County, New York, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 115
Recipients of Miscellaneous Farm Programs from farms in Orange County, New York totaled $1,626,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Farm Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Rick Minkus Farms Inc | New Hampton, NY 10958 | $15,232 |
22 | M & M Produce Farms & Sales | Goshen, NY 10924 | $14,613 |
23 | James Bastek | Westtown, NY 10998 | $13,484 |
24 | Susan Ochs Dba Ochs Orchard | Warwick, NY 10990 | $12,708 |
25 | Jados Farms | Pine Island, NY 10969 | $11,620 |
26 | Ochs Orchard | Warwick, NY 10990 | $10,597 |
27 | Walter Bastek | Westtown, NY 10998 | $10,491 |
28 | Charles W Innis | Wallkill, NY 12589 | $10,216 |
29 | Do Re Me Farms, Inc | New Hampton, NY 10958 | $9,813 |
30 | The Orchards Of Concklin | Pomona, NY 10970 | $9,403 |
31 | William M Plecan | New Hampton, NY 10958 | $8,666 |
32 | John J Ruszkiewicz | Pine Island, NY 10969 | $8,573 |
33 | John P Ruszkiewicz | Pine Island, NY 10969 | $8,568 |
34 | Nichris Corporation | Pine Island, NY 10969 | $8,084 |
35 | Pennings Farm | Warwick, NY 10990 | $7,806 |
36 | Elizabeth A Mikulski | Goshen, NY 10924 | $7,460 |
37 | Gantz Farm Service Inc | New Hampton, NY 10958 | $6,376 |
38 | Cavallaro Farms | Chester, NY 10918 | $6,030 |
39 | Hoeffner Farms Inc | Montgomery, NY 12549 | $5,529 |
40 | Raymond Myruski | Goshen, NY 10924 | $4,869 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”