Miscellaneous Farm Programs in Orange County, New York, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 115
Recipients of Miscellaneous Farm Programs from farms in Orange County, New York totaled $1,626,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Farm Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Crist Bros. Orchards, Inc. | Walden, NY 12586 | $262,001 |
2 | Minard Farms Inc | Clintondale, NY 12515 | $167,250 |
3 | W G Minard & Sons Inc | Clintondale, NY 12515 | $150,102 |
4 | Mt Airy Fruit Farm Inc | Newburgh, NY 12550 | $150,102 |
5 | Richard A Fino | Milton, NY 12547 | $117,380 |
6 | Masker Fruit Farms Inc | Warwick, NY 10990 | $115,996 |
7 | S Scimeca & Sons Inc | Highland, NY 12528 | $59,703 |
8 | Mark S Roe | Chester, NY 10918 | $45,973 |
9 | Lawrence Farms Orchards Inc | Newburgh, NY 12550 | $41,370 |
10 | Shuback Farms Inc | Goshen, NY 10924 | $40,281 |
11 | Pine Island Turf Nursery Inc | Pine Island, NY 10969 | $37,856 |
12 | R & T Orchards | Newburgh, NY 12550 | $31,716 |
13 | Stanley D Osczepinski Dba S & So | Goshen, NY 10924 | $29,768 |
14 | Soons Orchards Inc | New Hampton, NY 10958 | $24,491 |
15 | Morgiewicz Produce Inc | Goshen, NY 10924 | $22,978 |
16 | Harvest Queen Farms Ltd | Warwick, NY 10990 | $21,784 |
17 | David E Hull | Warwick, NY 10990 | $21,167 |
18 | John D Madura | Pine Island, NY 10969 | $18,809 |
19 | East Coast Spring Mix Inc | New Hampton, NY 10958 | $18,628 |
20 | Leonard Debuck | Pine Island, NY 10969 | $15,971 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>