Non-insured Disaster Assistance in Orange County, New York, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 133
Recipients of Non-insured Disaster Assistance from farms in Orange County, New York totaled $5,905,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Non-insured Disaster Assistance 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Shuback Farms Inc | Goshen, NY 10924 | $736,691 |
2 | R & G Produce, LLC | Goshen, NY 10924 | $515,210 |
3 | Frankie's Produce Farms Inc | Florida, NY 10921 | $456,133 |
4 | Pioneer King Produce Inc | Pine Island, NY 10969 | $431,414 |
5 | Jados Farms | Pine Island, NY 10969 | $319,712 |
6 | Floyd J Mikulski | Pine Island, NY 10969 | $241,098 |
7 | Stanley D Osczepinski Dba S & So | Goshen, NY 10924 | $229,245 |
8 | East Coast Spring Mix Inc | New Hampton, NY 10958 | $224,410 |
9 | F & F Farms | New Hampton, NY 10958 | $196,791 |
10 | Morgiewicz Produce, Inc. | Goshen, NY 10924 | $130,691 |
11 | Scattered Acres Farm LLC | Chester, NY 10918 | $119,745 |
12 | Elizabeth A Mikulski | Goshen, NY 10924 | $106,918 |
13 | Morgiewicz Produce Inc | Goshen, NY 10924 | $94,253 |
14 | Do Re Me Farms, Inc | New Hampton, NY 10958 | $91,365 |
15 | Harvest Queen Farms Ltd | Warwick, NY 10990 | $88,476 |
16 | Stacey F C Tam-liang | Pine Island, NY 10969 | $82,143 |
17 | S & So Produce | Goshen, NY 10924 | $77,170 |
18 | J Glebocki Farms LLC | Goshen, NY 10924 | $74,092 |
19 | Daniel Morgiewicz Sr | Goshen, NY 10924 | $71,391 |
20 | R & G Produce | Goshen, NY 10924 | $62,300 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>