Total Disaster Programs in Orange County, New York, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 488
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Orange County, New York totaled $27,063,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | B & H Farms Inc | Goshen, NY 10924 | $284,963 |
22 | Joseph Battiato | Chester, NY 10918 | $277,714 |
23 | Andrew Cavallaro | Goshen, NY 10924 | $273,350 |
24 | Frankie's Produce Farms Inc | Florida, NY 10921 | $263,283 |
25 | Caesar Chan | Pine Island, NY 10969 | $262,506 |
26 | Elizabeth A Mikulski | Goshen, NY 10924 | $262,356 |
27 | Gregory Yurchuk Jr | Florida, NY 10921 | $259,923 |
28 | Cavallaro Farms | Chester, NY 10918 | $256,693 |
29 | H & R Growers Inc | Pine Island, NY 10969 | $246,667 |
30 | Ronald R Myruski | New Hampton, NY 10958 | $245,084 |
31 | Dean Ford & Sons Dairy Farms LLC | Westtown, NY 10998 | $243,581 |
32 | Windy Maples Farm Inc | Middletown, NY 10940 | $236,440 |
33 | Stanley D Osczepinski Dba S & So | Goshen, NY 10924 | $229,245 |
34 | Alfred C Schultheis | Tabernacle, NJ 08088 | $227,166 |
35 | Stanley J Nowak Jr | Pine Island, NY 10969 | $224,173 |
36 | Do Re Me Farms, Inc | New Hampton, NY 10958 | $217,763 |
37 | Steven J Bogdanski | Pine Island, NY 10969 | $214,586 |
38 | Frank M Lichwick Jr | New Hampton, NY 10958 | $212,939 |
39 | Joseph L Lysack Jr | Warwick, NY 10990 | $210,048 |
40 | Joseph Sidoti | Pine Island, NY 10969 | $209,808 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”