SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program in Orange County, New York, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 33
Recipients of SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program from farms in Orange County, New York totaled $945,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Harvest Queen Farms Ltd | Warwick, NY 10990 | $100,000 |
2 | Jados Farms | Pine Island, NY 10969 | $94,845 |
3 | Floyd J Mikulski | Pine Island, NY 10969 | $84,813 |
4 | J Glebocki Farms LLC | Goshen, NY 10924 | $75,469 |
5 | East Coast Spring Mix Inc | New Hampton, NY 10958 | $73,602 |
6 | Scattered Acres Farm LLC | Chester, NY 10918 | $59,193 |
7 | Ronald R Myruski | New Hampton, NY 10958 | $45,983 |
8 | Pioneer King Produce Inc | Pine Island, NY 10969 | $45,830 |
9 | Gregory Myruski | Goshen, NY 10924 | $39,813 |
10 | Do Re Me Farms, Inc | New Hampton, NY 10958 | $31,816 |
11 | Frank S Mikulski | Goshen, NY 10924 | $30,520 |
12 | Raymond Myruski | Goshen, NY 10924 | $29,099 |
13 | Rick Minkus Farms Inc | New Hampton, NY 10958 | $28,861 |
14 | Keith Joseph Lysack | Florida, NY 10921 | $28,835 |
15 | Joseph Battiato | Chester, NY 10918 | $25,490 |
16 | Frank M Lichwick Jr | New Hampton, NY 10958 | $24,413 |
17 | Elizabeth A Mikulski | Goshen, NY 10924 | $17,982 |
18 | Christopher B Delo | Westtown, NY 10998 | $12,256 |
19 | Thomas Minkus | New Hampton, NY 10958 | $12,147 |
20 | Joseph Minkus | Slate Hill, NY 10973 | $10,263 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>