Total Commodity Programs in Orange County, New York, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 558
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Orange County, New York totaled $29,141,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | R & G Produce, LLC | Goshen, NY 10924 | $303,731 |
22 | Dagele Bros Produce Co | Florida, NY 10921 | $296,856 |
23 | Anthony Rudinski | Pine Island, NY 10969 | $289,550 |
24 | M & M Produce Farms & Sales | Goshen, NY 10924 | $288,144 |
25 | Harvest Queen Farms Ltd | Warwick, NY 10990 | $282,249 |
26 | Donald J Thorn | Thompson Ridge, NY 10985 | $272,141 |
27 | Double D Produce Inc | Florida, NY 10921 | $235,671 |
28 | Vandam Bros | Walden, NY 12586 | $234,898 |
29 | Davandjer Farms Inc | Pine Island, NY 10969 | $226,479 |
30 | Jacob Gros | Pine Bush, NY 12566 | $226,122 |
31 | George E Constable | Unionville, NY 10988 | $224,275 |
32 | Pine Island Turf Nursery Inc | Pine Island, NY 10969 | $223,048 |
33 | Masker Fruit Farms Inc | Warwick, NY 10990 | $217,537 |
34 | Dykshoorn Farm | Goshen, NY 10924 | $216,084 |
35 | Ljm Growers, Inc | Goshen, NY 10924 | $212,878 |
36 | Ebs Partners Dba Elvree Farms | Slate Hill, NY 10973 | $203,716 |
37 | Taida Orchids Ny Inc. | Pine Bush, NY 12566 | $202,389 |
38 | Wisner Farms Inc | Warwick, NY 10990 | $196,787 |
39 | Russell W Smiley | Middletown, NY 10941 | $195,141 |
40 | C Rowe & Sons | Campbell Hall, NY 10916 | $190,342 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”