Farm Subsidy information
Orleans County, New York
Total Subsidies in Orleans County, New York, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 955
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Orleans County, New York totaled $152,774,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Toussaint Farms, L.l.c. | Medina, NY 14103 | $1,023,468 |
22 | Navarras Farm Market & Greenhouse | Albion, NY 14411 | $988,249 |
23 | Joseph Heberle Farms | Hamlin, NY 14464 | $944,164 |
24 | Lloyd H Christ Jr | Holley, NY 14470 | $924,533 |
25 | Scott P Christ | Holley, NY 14470 | $870,549 |
26 | Hu-lane Farm LLC | Albion, NY 14411 | $852,843 |
27 | Kalir Enterprises Inc | Brockport, NY 14420 | $786,063 |
28 | Lamont Fruit Farm Inc | Waterport, NY 14571 | $760,795 |
29 | Penna Farms, LLC | Holley, NY 14470 | $753,535 |
30 | Ks Wolf Farms, LLC | Holley, NY 14470 | $740,350 |
31 | Chester Zelazny | Medina, NY 14103 | $729,428 |
32 | Dunham Family Farms | Medina, NY 14103 | $702,632 |
33 | Angevine Farms Inc | Albion, NY 14411 | $696,591 |
34 | Haylett Farm Enterprises | Albion, NY 14411 | $693,506 |
35 | Penna Farms | Holley, NY 14470 | $689,839 |
36 | Walter Zelazny And Sons | Medina, NY 14103 | $668,854 |
37 | Bennett Family Enterprises, Inc. | Albion, NY 14411 | $666,078 |
38 | Daniel Thomas Dresser Jr | Medina, NY 14103 | $663,283 |
39 | Steven J Nesbitt | Waterport, NY 14571 | $634,639 |
40 | Francis M Domoy | Oakfield, NY 14125 | $633,436 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”