Farm Subsidy information
Oswego County, New York
Total Subsidies in Oswego County, New York, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 641
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Oswego County, New York totaled $30,366,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Frederick J Patane | Hannibal, NY 13074 | $772,311 |
2 | Sorbello And Sons Inc | Fulton, NY 13069 | $700,056 |
3 | Wimler Farm Ny LLC | Fulton, NY 13069 | $625,961 |
4 | Richard F Potter | Richland, NY 13144 | $455,120 |
5 | Behling Orchards LLC | Mexico, NY 13114 | $440,293 |
6 | Frank Patane | Hannibal, NY 13074 | $395,810 |
7 | Earl A Wallis | Pulaski, NY 13142 | $346,484 |
8 | Timothy C Alford | Mannsville, NY 13661 | $318,399 |
9 | Thomas G Hubbard | Fulton, NY 13069 | $313,288 |
10 | Seeley Brook Farm LLC | Fulton, NY 13069 | $306,420 |
11 | Zappala Farms LLC | Cato, NY 13033 | $301,546 |
12 | Joseph Disalvo Farms Inc | Phoenix, NY 13135 | $298,865 |
13 | Douglaston Manor Inc | Pulaski, NY 13142 | $266,654 |
14 | Dan Dunsmoor Farms LLC | Oswego, NY 13126 | $236,593 |
15 | Eric A Hudson | Fulton, NY 13069 | $216,026 |
16 | Ridgedale Farms | Lacona, NY 13083 | $201,510 |
17 | John Dunsmoor Farms Inc | Oswego, NY 13126 | $195,465 |
18 | Robert E Welch | Fulton, NY 13069 | $192,704 |
19 | W Robert Nipper Jr | Fulton, NY 13069 | $181,568 |
20 | Elvic Farms | Pennellville, NY 13132 | $179,015 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>