Production Flexibility Program in Otsego County, New York, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 225
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Otsego County, New York totaled $1,752,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Cooperstown Holstein Corp | Cooperstown, NY 13326 | $108,051 |
2 | Ack Acres | South New Berlin, NY 13843 | $59,954 |
3 | Hemlock Valley Farm LLC | Milford, NY 13807 | $43,600 |
4 | Reinhart Jahnke | Milford, NY 13807 | $43,360 |
5 | Paul Naujeck | Oneonta, NY 13820 | $37,102 |
6 | James Gates | West Winfield, NY 13491 | $36,277 |
7 | Kermit & Myron Fassett | East Springfield, NY 13333 | $34,686 |
8 | C L Miller Co Inc | Springfield Center, NY 13468 | $33,893 |
9 | Robert A Tracy | Cooperstown, NY 13326 | $33,624 |
10 | Roedale Farm LLC | Richfield Springs, NY 13439 | $33,020 |
11 | Timothy D Green Shirmarg Farms | Worcester, NY 12197 | $32,218 |
12 | Bruce Patryn | Springfield Center, NY 13468 | $29,992 |
13 | Hedges Farms | New Berlin, NY 13411 | $28,559 |
14 | Wendell E Rogers | West Winfield, NY 13491 | $26,951 |
15 | Crisman Bros | Jordanville, NY 13361 | $26,574 |
16 | Glensfoot Farms Inc | Cherry Valley, NY 13320 | $26,156 |
17 | Ferguson Farm | West Winfield, NY 13491 | $25,250 |
18 | Gretna Acres | Otego, NY 13825 | $22,758 |
19 | Timothy M Cantwell | Richfield Springs, NY 13439 | $21,736 |
20 | William C Steenburg | Jordanville, NY 13361 | $21,478 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>