Production Flexibility Program in Rensselaer County, New York, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 264
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Rensselaer County, New York totaled $3,655,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | James Winn | Petersburg, NY 12138 | $11,522 |
82 | D Mark Moody | Valley Falls, NY 12185 | $11,244 |
83 | Robert R Weir Jr | Schaghticoke, NY 12154 | $11,202 |
84 | Donald Cary | Schaghticoke, NY 12154 | $11,086 |
85 | Edward Swartz Jr | Castleton On Hudson, NY 12033 | $10,980 |
86 | Scott Swartz | Castleton On Hudson, NY 12033 | $10,980 |
87 | Richard Senter | Stephentown, NY 12168 | $10,755 |
88 | Beverly Moore | Valley Falls, NY 12185 | $10,737 |
89 | Matthew C. Cannon | Johnsonville, NY 12094 | $10,724 |
90 | Estate Of James P Welch | Troy, NY 12180 | $10,659 |
91 | Paul H Wiley | Johnsonville, NY 12094 | $10,507 |
92 | Estate Of Carlton Luke | Hoosick Falls, NY 12090 | $10,431 |
93 | Estate Of Betty Beck | Eagle Bridge, NY 12057 | $10,307 |
94 | John Orecki Jr | Wynantskill, NY 12198 | $10,021 |
95 | Boilingbrook Farm | Hoosick Falls, NY 12090 | $9,717 |
96 | William H Weir | Schaghticoke, NY 12154 | $9,466 |
97 | Matt Beck | Eagle Bridge, NY 12057 | $9,410 |
98 | St Croix Farm Inc | Valley Falls, NY 12185 | $9,051 |
99 | John Ruebel | Petersburg, NY 12138 | $8,694 |
100 | Sheila F Morris | Melrose, NY 12121 | $8,691 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”