Production Flexibility Program in Rensselaer County, New York, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 264
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Rensselaer County, New York totaled $3,655,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Anthony Stephen Maier | Nassau, NY 12123 | $8,603 |
102 | David Schmidt | Melrose, NY 12121 | $8,568 |
103 | William E Michel | Valley Falls, NY 12185 | $8,545 |
104 | Estate Of Roger Moseley | Buskirk, NY 12028 | $8,439 |
105 | Marvin Ginsburg | Troy, NY 12180 | $8,236 |
106 | Ronald E Kardas | Valley Falls, NY 12185 | $8,172 |
107 | Unc Brock Inc | Schaghticoke, NY 12154 | $8,105 |
108 | Estate Of Walter R Marpe | Johnsonville, NY 12094 | $8,071 |
109 | George Skott | Buskirk, NY 12028 | $7,852 |
110 | Estate Of Vincent Fedorowicz | East Greenbush, NY 12061 | $7,761 |
111 | Allenwaite Farms Inc | Schaghticoke, NY 12154 | $7,756 |
112 | David Moore | Valley Falls, NY 12185 | $7,574 |
113 | Allen Cornell | Hoosick Falls, NY 12090 | $7,106 |
114 | Richard & Katherine Moses | Eagle Bridge, NY 12057 | $7,048 |
115 | Edwin Roberts Sr | Troy, NY 12180 | $7,031 |
116 | Ernest Kershaw | Melrose, NY 12121 | $6,997 |
117 | Dale R French | Nassau, NY 12123 | $6,899 |
118 | Landview Farms | Eagle Bridge, NY 12057 | $6,735 |
119 | Kenneth Burns | Hoosick Falls, NY 12090 | $6,723 |
120 | Valentine Kalbfliesh | Melrose, NY 12121 | $6,706 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”