Production Flexibility Program in Rensselaer County, New York, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 264
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Rensselaer County, New York totaled $3,655,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Brimmer Farms Inc | Petersburg, NY 12138 | $31,547 |
22 | Larry Bugbee | Hoosick Falls, NY 12090 | $31,445 |
23 | David G Green | Petersburg, NY 12138 | $30,606 |
24 | Paul W Peter | Castleton On Hudson, NY 12033 | $29,172 |
25 | George A Stannard | Valley Falls, NY 12185 | $27,766 |
26 | Margaret Cottrell Dba Battle Acre | Hoosick Falls, NY 12090 | $27,469 |
27 | Hooskip Farms | Petersburg, NY 12138 | $26,722 |
28 | Dingle Hill Farms | Salisbury, NC 28146 | $25,707 |
29 | Scheeren Seed Company | Schaghticoke, NY 12154 | $25,504 |
30 | Estate Of Charles E Lohnes | Hoosick Falls, NY 12090 | $25,171 |
31 | Westwind Ag, LLC | Schaghticoke, NY 12154 | $25,058 |
32 | Richard Wertman | Melrose, NY 12121 | $24,561 |
33 | Jack Wysocki | Hoosick Falls, NY 12090 | $24,521 |
34 | Stearns Brothers | Hoosick Falls, NY 12090 | $24,446 |
35 | Bruce Moody | Poestenkill, NY 12140 | $24,345 |
36 | John Weir | Schaghticoke, NY 12154 | $23,890 |
37 | Walter Auclair | Melrose, NY 12121 | $23,471 |
38 | Trzcinski Farm Properties LLC | Troy, NY 12180 | $23,438 |
39 | Tarbox Farms, LLC | Troy, NY 12180 | $23,040 |
40 | Golden Farm | Schodack Landing, NY 12156 | $22,861 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”