Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Rensselaer County, New York, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 52
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Rensselaer County, New York totaled $203,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Jack Wysocki | Hoosick Falls, NY 12090 | $3,485 |
22 | Kathleen Beck Dba Eagle Bridge Fa | Eagle Bridge, NY 12057 | $3,334 |
23 | John Mcknight | Troy, NY 12180 | $3,249 |
24 | Daniel J Casey | Schaghticoke, NY 12154 | $2,757 |
25 | Beatrice Berle | Hoosick, NY 12089 | $2,708 |
26 | Flag Acres Zoo Inc | Hoosick Falls, NY 12090 | $2,619 |
27 | Glenn Olsen | Carle Place, NY 11514 | $2,408 |
28 | Roy Denniston | Nassau, NY 12123 | $2,004 |
29 | Robert W Lohnes | Hoosick Falls, NY 12090 | $1,976 |
30 | John Betts | Valley Falls, NY 12185 | $1,860 |
31 | Matt Beck | Eagle Bridge, NY 12057 | $1,789 |
32 | Swartz Farms | Castleton On Hudson, NY 12033 | $1,750 |
33 | Barbara Filkins | Hoosick Falls, NY 12090 | $1,720 |
34 | Robert Mason | Buskirk, NY 12028 | $1,678 |
35 | Terrance C Hoag | Hoosick Falls, NY 12090 | $1,500 |
36 | Edmaral Farms | Johnsonville, NY 12094 | $1,477 |
37 | Robert Kalbfliesh | Johnsonville, NY 12094 | $1,438 |
38 | Larry C Baker | Eagle Bridge, NY 12057 | $1,187 |
39 | Brimmer Farms Inc | Petersburg, NY 12138 | $1,185 |
40 | Dennis Brownell | North Hoosick, NY 12133 | $1,170 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”