Production Flexibility Program in Saratoga County, New York, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 108
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Saratoga County, New York totaled $1,816,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Lena T Johnson | Mechanicville, NY 12118 | $4,286 |
62 | Henry Moak | Schuylerville, NY 12871 | $3,934 |
63 | John Hall And Son | Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 | $3,820 |
64 | William J Betts | Waterford, NY 12188 | $3,719 |
65 | Robert Downing | Ballston Lake, NY 12019 | $3,568 |
66 | Estate Of Stanley Kelley | Ballston Lake, NY 12019 | $3,498 |
67 | Joseph Killian | Gansevoort, NY 12831 | $3,468 |
68 | James Holbrook | Ballston Lake, NY 12019 | $3,440 |
69 | John Wunderlich | Latham, NY 12110 | $2,734 |
70 | David Garrison | Ballston Spa, NY 12020 | $2,728 |
71 | John Vincek | Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 | $2,594 |
72 | John Krasuski | Mechanicville, NY 12118 | $2,529 |
73 | June Corbett | Gansevoort, NY 12831 | $2,226 |
74 | Gary Breski | Schaghticoke, NY 12154 | $2,179 |
75 | Matthew W Luke | Ballston Lake, NY 12019 | $1,979 |
76 | Mcmahon Thoroughbred Farm | Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 | $1,966 |
77 | Chester H Orzolek | Ballston Lake, NY 12019 | $1,820 |
78 | Donald Tooker | Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 | $1,596 |
79 | John Schultz | Stillwater, NY 12170 | $1,369 |
80 | Raymond E Black | Ballston Lake, NY 12019 | $1,363 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”