Farm Subsidy information
Schenectady County, New York
Total Subsidies in Schenectady County, New York, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 70
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Schenectady County, New York totaled $3,243,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | James A Gaylord | Delanson, NY 12053 | $2,204 |
42 | Robert J Chandler Jr | Delanson, NY 12053 | $2,033 |
43 | William V Giniecki | Schenectady, NY 12304 | $2,018 |
44 | Malcolm Wilber | Delanson, NY 12053 | $1,879 |
45 | David & Sheila Tretiak | Amsterdam, NY 12010 | $1,560 |
46 | Evelyn Paddock | Ballston Spa, NY 12020 | $1,277 |
47 | Carmella Badalucco | Amsterdam, NY 12010 | $1,277 |
48 | Paul Neznek | Pattersonville, NY 12137 | $1,125 |
49 | Brian Haines | Schenectady, NY 12303 | $1,107 |
50 | Aucompaugh Acres Inc | Pattersonville, NY 12137 | $849 |
51 | Thomas M Nelson | Pattersonville, NY 12137 | $596 |
52 | Running Creek Farm | Schenectady, NY 12306 | $594 |
53 | Patricia Lynch | Esperance, NY 12066 | $585 |
54 | John P Van Oort | Schenectady, NY 12306 | $342 |
55 | Jenilu Schoolman Estate | Delanson, NY 12053 | $287 |
56 | Gail L Kabir | Waller, TX 77484 | $216 |
57 | Rita G Decocco | Duanesburg, NY 12056 | $207 |
58 | William Griessler | Delanson, NY 12053 | $180 |
59 | Daniel Sells | Duanesburg, NY 12056 | $149 |
60 | Jay Anderson | Amsterdam, NY 12010 | $145 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”