Farm Subsidy information
Schoharie County, New York
Total Subsidies in Schoharie County, New York, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 649
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Schoharie County, New York totaled $30,402,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | George Freeman | Cobleskill, NY 12043 | $51,883 |
122 | Edward E Bradt III | Cobleskill, NY 12043 | $51,778 |
123 | Jeffrey E Blood | Cobleskill, NY 12043 | $51,294 |
124 | Darrell Kniskern | Cobleskill, NY 12043 | $51,222 |
125 | Terry L Davis | Central Bridge, NY 12035 | $50,981 |
126 | Edward C Sisson | Central Bridge, NY 12035 | $50,616 |
127 | Sylvester J Huse | Warnerville, NY 12187 | $50,443 |
128 | Petr Blahout | Richmondville, NY 12149 | $49,621 |
129 | Paul W Pohls | Esperance, NY 12066 | $49,432 |
130 | Allan Tillapaugh | Saint Helena Island, SC 29920 | $49,257 |
131 | Charles Fox | Schoharie, NY 12157 | $49,071 |
132 | Peter L Hansen | Sharon Springs, NY 13459 | $49,033 |
133 | Terrence Johns | Richmondville, NY 12149 | $48,226 |
134 | Frank Youngs | Schoharie, NY 12157 | $47,685 |
135 | Richard J Aiello | Middleburgh, NY 12043 | $46,516 |
136 | Stanley Palmer Jr | Richmondville, NY 12149 | $46,428 |
137 | Lydia M Vanevera | Cobleskill, NY 12043 | $46,095 |
138 | Jacob R Vanevera | Cobleskill, NY 12043 | $45,747 |
139 | Theresa Fagnani | Schoharie, NY 12157 | $45,493 |
140 | Charles Reed Jr | Cobleskill, NY 12043 | $45,432 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”