Loan Deficiency in Suffolk County, New York, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 24
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Suffolk County, New York totaled $86,999 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Peter H Dankowski | Wainscott, NY 11975 | $18,210 |
2 | Ralph L Dayton | Pantego, NC 27860 | $11,618 |
3 | Robert Rowehl | Mattituck, NY 11952 | $10,745 |
4 | Walter J Zilnicki Inc | Riverhead, NY 11901 | $9,062 |
5 | Edward Zilnicki | Riverhead, NY 11901 | $5,746 |
6 | Robert Rutkoski | Mattituck, NY 11952 | $5,367 |
7 | Robert Sidor | Mattituck, NY 11952 | $5,194 |
8 | Thor Eriksen | Ridge, NY 11961 | $3,531 |
9 | Henry Kraszewski Jr | Water Mill, NY 11976 | $3,414 |
10 | Edward Sujecki | Calverton, NY 11933 | $2,709 |
11 | William Fedun | Calverton, NY 11933 | $1,751 |
12 | Martin Sidor Farms Inc | Mattituck, NY 11952 | $1,677 |
13 | David Wines | Riverhead, NY 11901 | $1,517 |
14 | Miguel A Valentin | Ronkonkoma, NY 11779 | $1,338 |
15 | Thomas A Funfgeld | Calverton, NY 11933 | $1,193 |
16 | Diana G Yakaboski | Calverton, NY 11933 | $1,193 |
17 | Fred A Lewin | Calverton, NY 11933 | $950 |
18 | Daniel G Donahue Jr | Calverton, NY 11933 | $739 |
19 | Romanski Inc | Riverhead, NY 11901 | $471 |
20 | Prechtl Brothers Inc | Mount Sinai, NY 11766 | $283 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>