Total Disaster Programs in Suffolk County, New York, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 96
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Suffolk County, New York totaled $7,202,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Mudd Vineyards Ltd | Southold, NY 11971 | $9,256 |
62 | Harbor Lights Oyster Co. LLC | Southold, NY 11971 | $8,076 |
63 | Mccullough Vineyard Inc | Cutchogue, NY 11935 | $8,073 |
64 | Hampton Oyster Company LLC | Laurel, NY 11948 | $7,931 |
65 | Wowak Farms Inc | Laurel, NY 11948 | $7,778 |
66 | Corwin Farms | Riverhead, NY 11901 | $7,335 |
67 | Wickham's Fruit Farm | Cutchogue, NY 11935 | $7,311 |
68 | Ringhoff Farms Inc | East Moriches, NY 11940 | $7,171 |
69 | Edwin Fishel Tuccio | Riverhead, NY 11901 | $7,076 |
70 | Steamboat Channel Oyster Company | Bay Shore, NY 11706 | $6,488 |
71 | Borella Nursery, Inc. | Nesconset, NY 11767 | $6,487 |
72 | Carol's Plant Shed Inc | Ronkonkoma, NY 11779 | $6,226 |
73 | Cornell Cooperative Extension Of | Riverhead, NY 11901 | $6,103 |
74 | Captain Ockers Oyster Co Inc | Bay Shore, NY 11706 | $5,979 |
75 | George T Conway Estate | Southold, NY 11971 | $4,715 |
76 | William J Polak Jr | Aquebogue, NY 11931 | $4,609 |
77 | Lewin Farms Inc | Seaview, VA 23429 | $4,464 |
78 | The Farrm | Calverton, NY 11933 | $4,309 |
79 | Reginald Farr | Calverton, NY 11933 | $4,107 |
80 | Golden Earthworm Organic Farm LLC | Jamesport, NY 11947 | $3,973 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”