Counter Cyclical Program in Sullivan County, New York, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 71
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Sullivan County, New York totaled $140,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Donald Ackerley Dba Ackerley Farm | Grahamsville, NY 12740 | $2,311 |
22 | John H Diehl Sr | Callicoon, NY 12723 | $2,256 |
23 | James Dole | Woodbourne, NY 12788 | $2,022 |
24 | William Diehl | Callicoon, NY 12723 | $1,962 |
25 | Albert Thony Dba Thony's Dairy | Jeffersonville, NY 12748 | $1,711 |
26 | Ellis Hanslmaier | Jeffersonville, NY 12748 | $1,676 |
27 | Gene A Walter | Loch Sheldrake, NY 12759 | $1,607 |
28 | Russell Olsen | Livingston Manor, NY 12758 | $1,592 |
29 | Daniel Peters | Callicoon, NY 12723 | $1,591 |
30 | David Weiss | Swan Lake, NY 12783 | $1,590 |
31 | Sydney G Peters Jr | Scipio Center, NY 13147 | $1,351 |
32 | Brown Farms | Jeffersonville, NY 12748 | $1,119 |
33 | James C Wilcox | Roscoe, NY 12776 | $1,102 |
34 | Paul Hahn Dba Hahn Brothers | Callicoon Center, NY 12724 | $1,097 |
35 | John Ferber | Callicoon, NY 12723 | $1,097 |
36 | Kenneth Peters | Callicoon, NY 12723 | $1,088 |
37 | Ernst Reimer Jr | North Branch, NY 12766 | $1,084 |
38 | Gary Krantz | Callicoon, NY 12723 | $1,031 |
39 | Walter Keegan | Callicoon, NY 12723 | $950 |
40 | Phil Long | Callicoon, NY 12723 | $912 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”