Total Commodity Programs in Sullivan County, New York, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 205
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Sullivan County, New York totaled $9,737,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | David Weiss | Swan Lake, NY 12783 | $719,023 |
2 | La Belle Farm, Inc | Ferndale, NY 12734 | $705,450 |
3 | Hvfg LLC | Ferndale, NY 12734 | $625,000 |
4 | Kays Farm, LLC | Callicoon, NY 12723 | $465,134 |
5 | Peter Erlwein | Jeffersonville, NY 12748 | $328,770 |
6 | Hudson Valley Chicken LLC | Ferndale, NY 12734 | $312,500 |
7 | Wilfred R Hughson | Jeffersonville, NY 12748 | $304,537 |
8 | Michel Farms | Swan Lake, NY 12783 | $289,630 |
9 | David Peters | Hortonville, NY 12745 | $278,467 |
10 | Bella Poultry Inc | Ferndale, NY 12734 | $250,000 |
11 | Sullivan Poultry Inc | South Fallsburg, NY 12779 | $250,000 |
12 | Harold Brey & Sons Inc | Jeffersonville, NY 12748 | $247,516 |
13 | Mr Wilfred R Hughson | Jeffersonville, NY 12748 | $198,917 |
14 | Stefan Gieger | Jeffersonville, NY 12748 | $194,235 |
15 | Ralph F Sykes | Hortonville, NY 12745 | $184,520 |
16 | Daniel Peters | Callicoon, NY 12723 | $184,240 |
17 | Harold & Lynn Russell | Cochecton, NY 12726 | $182,266 |
18 | Peter Diehl | Callicoon, NY 12723 | $166,091 |
19 | Herman Herbert | Callicoon, NY 12723 | $165,445 |
20 | Ackermann Farms Inc | Cochecton, NY 12726 | $124,634 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>