Farm Subsidy information
Ulster County, New York
Total Subsidies in Ulster County, New York, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 298
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Ulster County, New York totaled $40,772,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Overlook Farms Inc | Milton, NY 12547 | $251,702 |
22 | Hudson Valley Grown Inc. Dba Hepw | Milton, NY 12547 | $250,000 |
23 | A Zimmerman & Son Inc | Highland, NY 12528 | $245,455 |
24 | Schreiber Orchard | Milton, NY 12547 | $240,183 |
25 | Frank Scaturro | Ulster Park, NY 12487 | $238,014 |
26 | M G Hurd & Sons Inc | Clintondale, NY 12515 | $237,954 |
27 | J & B Trapani Co Inc | Milton, NY 12547 | $235,381 |
28 | Robert O Davenport & Sons LLC | Kingston, NY 12401 | $219,672 |
29 | Wilklow Orchards | Highland, NY 12528 | $209,367 |
30 | Gill Corn Farms Inc | Hurley, NY 12443 | $192,667 |
31 | Hudson Valley Farms Inc | Highland, NY 12528 | $186,326 |
32 | Steven Clarke | Milton, NY 12547 | $181,347 |
33 | Benjamin Trapani III | Milton, NY 12547 | $179,051 |
34 | Wright Orchards LLC | Gardiner, NY 12525 | $168,165 |
35 | Van Duser Orchards Inc | Wallkill, NY 12589 | $164,494 |
36 | B & L Caradonna | Milton, NY 12547 | $163,014 |
37 | Moriello Bros Inc | New Paltz, NY 12561 | $154,900 |
38 | Coy Orchards Inc | Clintondale, NY 12515 | $153,602 |
39 | Martin Farms | Milton, NY 12547 | $152,763 |
40 | Frank Tantillo & Son | Gardiner, NY 12525 | $150,454 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”