Miscellaneous Disaster Programs in Washington County, New York, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 93
Recipients of Miscellaneous Disaster Programs from farms in Washington County, New York totaled $1,365,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Walter Pinkowski Jr | Argyle, NY 12809 | $22,451 |
22 | Brent H Petteys | Fort Ann, NY 12827 | $22,405 |
23 | Ernest Steves Sr & Ernest Steves | Whitehall, NY 12887 | $22,298 |
24 | Raymond Earl Horton | Cambridge, NY 12816 | $22,105 |
25 | Willard Durkee | Fort Ann, NY 12827 | $21,825 |
26 | Walker Farms, LLC | Fort Ann, NY 12827 | $20,659 |
27 | Carl E Pratt | Whitehall, NY 12887 | $20,625 |
28 | Andrew Van Dewater | Cambridge, NY 12816 | $20,134 |
29 | Michael & Rita Swezey | Fort Ann, NY 12827 | $19,246 |
30 | Duane & Stephanie Burch | Granville, NY 12832 | $19,234 |
31 | David P Wilbur | Greenwich, NY 12834 | $17,365 |
32 | Joseph & Cynthia Roberts | Granville, NY 12832 | $17,090 |
33 | Daniel & Olive Thomas | Cambridge, NY 12816 | $16,414 |
34 | Andland Farms LLC | Eagle Bridge, NY 12057 | $16,150 |
35 | Jan P King | Schuylerville, NY 12871 | $15,593 |
36 | Kevin W & Tammy Eastman | Hartford, NY 12838 | $15,108 |
37 | Adams Acres Farm | Whitehall, NY 12887 | $14,608 |
38 | Milton G Tyler Est | Fort Ann, NY 12827 | $14,197 |
39 | Richard Harsha | Fort Ann, NY 12827 | $14,156 |
40 | Odelie Harsha | Fort Ann, NY 12827 | $14,156 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”