Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in Washington County, New York, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 336
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in Washington County, New York totaled $1,135,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | David & Nancy Hall | Fort Ann, NY 12827 | $6,894 |
42 | Brian Barbur | Greenwich, NY 12834 | $6,745 |
43 | Valley View Farm | Fort Edward, NY 12828 | $6,625 |
44 | Mercure Farms | Granville, NY 12832 | $6,579 |
45 | Alfred & Dawn Stannard | Valley Falls, NY 12185 | $6,507 |
46 | Leonard & Rebecca Austin | Eagle Bridge, NY 12057 | $6,471 |
47 | Marchaland Farm | Greenwich, NY 12834 | $6,415 |
48 | Vernon Sheldon Est | Granville, NY 12832 | $6,377 |
49 | Maxwell Farms | Cambridge, NY 12816 | $6,368 |
50 | David Lufkin | Argyle, NY 12809 | $6,300 |
51 | Brent H Petteys | Fort Ann, NY 12827 | $6,233 |
52 | Roy & Jean Wicks | Fort Edward, NY 12828 | $6,179 |
53 | Stephen Lane | Calabash, NC 28467 | $6,012 |
54 | Cornerest Farm LLC | Granville, NY 12832 | $5,967 |
55 | Hi-brow Farms | Salem, NY 12865 | $5,856 |
56 | Michael & Sharon Waite | Salem, NY 12865 | $5,760 |
57 | Harold Carlton Farms | Cambridge, NY 12816 | $5,751 |
58 | Daniel J Lindsay | Hudson Falls, NY 12839 | $5,747 |
59 | David P Wilbur | Greenwich, NY 12834 | $5,702 |
60 | Bainridge Farms | Argyle, NY 12809 | $5,688 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”