Total Commodity Programs in Washington County, New York, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 190
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Washington County, New York totaled $6,161,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Weeping Birch Farm, LLC | Greenwich, NY 12834 | $58,984 |
42 | Darfler Farm LLC | Greenwich, NY 12834 | $54,827 |
43 | Easton Dairy | Greenwich, NY 12834 | $54,684 |
44 | Grimes Dairy Farm LLC | Greenwich, NY 12834 | $54,436 |
45 | Kyle C Reid | Argyle, NY 12809 | $50,238 |
46 | Manor View Farms LLC | Granville, NY 12832 | $47,888 |
47 | Mercure Farms | Granville, NY 12832 | $47,716 |
48 | Albert W Marns | Hudson Falls, NY 12839 | $47,519 |
49 | Donna M Marns | Hudson Falls, NY 12839 | $47,484 |
50 | Markwell A Aldous | Granville, NY 12832 | $46,379 |
51 | Skiff Farms Inc | Greenwich, NY 12834 | $46,295 |
52 | Sawyer J Dean | Fort Edward, NY 12828 | $45,622 |
53 | Foot-hill Farm LLC | Hartford, NY 12838 | $41,417 |
54 | Michael & Louise Wooddell | Fort Ann, NY 12827 | $36,956 |
55 | Clark Family Crop Service LLC | Cambridge, NY 12816 | $33,354 |
56 | Liddleholme Holsteins, LLC | Argyle, NY 12809 | $31,547 |
57 | R. Nick Depew | Argyle, NY 12809 | $31,295 |
58 | Elm Spring Farm LLC | Eagle Bridge, NY 12057 | $31,152 |
59 | Douglas L Fuller | Fort Ann, NY 12827 | $30,911 |
60 | Elm Spring Farm LLC | Eagle Bridge, NY 12057 | $30,509 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”