Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in Washington County, New York, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 336
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in Washington County, New York totaled $1,135,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Michael & Rita Swezey | Fort Ann, NY 12827 | $5,589 |
62 | Purple Dell Farm | Hampton, NY 12837 | $5,463 |
63 | Andland Farms | Eagle Bridge, NY 12057 | $5,432 |
64 | Nelson & Gladys Greene | Granville, NY 12832 | $5,432 |
65 | Milton G Tyler Est | Fort Ann, NY 12827 | $5,315 |
66 | Ruth A Cary | Salem, NY 12865 | $5,203 |
67 | Charles F Cary Estate | Salem, NY 12865 | $5,203 |
68 | Rea & Carol Campbell | Salem, NY 12865 | $5,193 |
69 | Wilbur-holm Farm | Greenwich, NY 12834 | $5,184 |
70 | Booth's Dairy Farm LLC | Greenwich, NY 12834 | $5,130 |
71 | R Harry & Joanne Booth | Greenwich, NY 12834 | $5,126 |
72 | Daniel & Olive Thomas | Cambridge, NY 12816 | $5,099 |
73 | John Tudor As John Tudor | Eagle Bridge, NY 12057 | $5,094 |
74 | Albert W Marns | Hudson Falls, NY 12839 | $5,063 |
75 | Kuster Farm | Hudson Falls, NY 12839 | $5,040 |
76 | Reafield Farm LLC | Cambridge, NY 12816 | $4,964 |
77 | Toolite Farms LLC | Granville, NY 12832 | $4,937 |
78 | William & Regina Lundy | Granville, NY 12832 | $4,892 |
79 | Yorkmont Farm Inc | Hampton, NY 12837 | $4,802 |
80 | Richard E Stewart | Hartford, NY 12838 | $4,631 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”