Dairy Programs in Washington County, New York, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 86
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in Washington County, New York totaled $5,247,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Allenwaite Farms Inc | Schaghticoke, NY 12154 | $161,540 |
2 | Chambers Valley Farms Inc | Salem, NY 12865 | $142,062 |
3 | Ideal Dairy LLC | Hudson Falls, NY 12839 | $141,221 |
4 | Woody Hill Farms Inc | Salem, NY 12865 | $135,042 |
5 | Walker Farms, LLC | Fort Ann, NY 12827 | $134,913 |
6 | Tiashoke Farms, LLC | Buskirk, NY 12028 | $134,515 |
7 | Landview Farms, L.l.c. | Eagle Bridge, NY 12057 | $132,422 |
8 | Fullerton Dairy LLC | Argyle, NY 12809 | $130,195 |
9 | Guy Clark III | Cambridge, NY 12816 | $129,337 |
10 | Jeremy Wolff | Valley Falls, NY 12185 | $129,288 |
11 | Copses Farms LLC | Valley Falls, NY 12185 | $128,884 |
12 | Gettyvue Farm LLC | Granville, NY 12832 | $128,770 |
13 | Kenyon Hill Farm LLC | Cambridge, NY 12816 | $124,858 |
14 | Black Creek Valley Farms Inc | Salem, NY 12865 | $123,944 |
15 | Kenneth L Thomas III | Middle Granville, NY 12849 | $123,190 |
16 | Battenkill Dairy Farms LLC | Salem, NY 12865 | $122,600 |
17 | Brotherhood Farms L.l.c. | Greenwich, NY 12834 | $121,699 |
18 | Reafield Farm LLC | Cambridge, NY 12816 | $121,061 |
19 | Heritage Hill Farm LLC | Fort Ann, NY 12827 | $120,966 |
20 | Lincoln Hill Holsteins, LLC | Eagle Bridge, NY 12057 | $120,929 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>