Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Yates County, New York, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 167
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Yates County, New York totaled $3,013,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | N Andy Siwak | Himrod, NY 14842 | $4,353 |
122 | Matthew Lewis | Penn Yan, NY 14527 | $4,339 |
123 | Raymond R Zimmerman | Penn Yan, NY 14527 | $4,338 |
124 | Danny Bagley | Rushville, NY 14544 | $4,302 |
125 | Wayne Dunton | Naples, NY 14512 | $4,108 |
126 | Rock Stream Vineyards LLC | Rock Stream, NY 14878 | $3,991 |
127 | Matthew J Yonts | Bluff Point, NY 14478 | $3,953 |
128 | Daniel C Mullins | Penn Yan, NY 14527 | $3,907 |
129 | Jessica Lynn Perry | Watkins Glen, NY 14891 | $3,732 |
130 | John E Kriese | Branchport, NY 14418 | $3,575 |
131 | Richard J Perry | Watkins Glen, NY 14891 | $3,575 |
132 | Roger Dick | York, PA 17402 | $3,477 |
133 | Neil J Simmons | Penn Yan, NY 14527 | $3,405 |
134 | Keuka Spring Vineyards LLC | Penn Yan, NY 14527 | $3,377 |
135 | David Lamar Hoover | Dundee, NY 14837 | $3,149 |
136 | Eastside Vineyards LLC | Dundee, NY 14837 | $3,072 |
137 | Jeffrey L Mac Donald | Penn Yan, NY 14527 | $3,007 |
138 | Leon H Henderson | Penn Yan, NY 14527 | $2,867 |
139 | Timothy Pinneo | Penn Yan, NY 14527 | $2,866 |
140 | Daryl Dunton | Middlesex, NY 14507 | $2,824 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”