Farm Subsidy information
Yates County, New York
Total Subsidies in Yates County, New York, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 704
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Yates County, New York totaled $44,201,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Samuel E Oswald | Penn Yan, NY 14527 | $1,248,434 |
2 | Leon N Button | Rushville, NY 14544 | $1,064,118 |
3 | Alan D Tomion | Penn Yan, NY 14527 | $954,587 |
4 | Vaughan Farms, LLC | Penn Yan, NY 14527 | $804,944 |
5 | Lilyea Farms LLC | Penn Yan, NY 14527 | $604,759 |
6 | Dale G Hallings | Penn Yan, NY 14527 | $537,277 |
7 | David Andersen Farms | Penn Yan, NY 14527 | $535,059 |
8 | David Vaughan | Penn Yan, NY 14527 | $496,053 |
9 | Clearview Farms & Vineyards, LLC | Branchport, NY 14418 | $481,124 |
10 | Lilyea Farms LLC | Penn Yan, NY 14527 | $475,801 |
11 | Klaas And Mary-howell Martens | Penn Yan, NY 14527 | $475,487 |
12 | Allen M Faus | Rock Stream, NY 14878 | $458,720 |
13 | Guy R Christiansen | Penn Yan, NY 14527 | $399,406 |
14 | Jim And Nate Henderson Farms | Penn Yan, NY 14527 | $391,864 |
15 | Potterosa Farms | Rushville, NY 14544 | $342,881 |
16 | Joseph W Patchett | Geneva, NY 14456 | $339,231 |
17 | Pendleton Farms LLC | Rushville, NY 14544 | $333,980 |
18 | Roe Acres Inc | Bellona, NY 14415 | $318,240 |
19 | Martens Farms | Penn Yan, NY 14527 | $293,971 |
20 | Bernard S Johnson | Penn Yan, NY 14527 | $291,245 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>