Farm Subsidy information
North Carolina
Total Subsidies in North Carolina, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 7,308
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in North Carolina totaled $470,212,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | , | $693,294 | |
22 | D & W Farms | Hobgood, NC 27843 | $691,291 |
23 | Sugar Shack Farms LLC | Wilmington, NC 28411 | $672,318 |
24 | Simpson Farms LLC | Roseboro, NC 28382 | $666,372 |
25 | William K Barnwell | Edneyville, NC 28727 | $638,905 |
26 | J Michael Hope | Clinton, NC 28328 | $637,395 |
27 | Vick Family Farms Partnership | Wilson, NC 27896 | $631,872 |
28 | Knob Creek Orchards Inc | Lawndale, NC 28090 | $597,841 |
29 | M & M Berry Farm LLC | Edneyville, NC 28727 | $592,666 |
30 | Danny R Justice | Edneyville, NC 28727 | $589,258 |
31 | Coston Farm LLC | Hendersonville, NC 28792 | $568,876 |
32 | Lancaster Properties | Stantonsburg, NC 27883 | $568,870 |
33 | Anderson Farms | Tarboro, NC 27886 | $562,758 |
34 | Charles Marvin Tart Sr | Dunn, NC 28334 | $553,822 |
35 | Keel Brothers Farms | Robersonville, NC 27871 | $540,068 |
36 | J C Howard Farms LLC | Deep Run, NC 28525 | $540,000 |
37 | James B Best | Newton Grove, NC 28366 | $522,238 |
38 | Lester Robbin Best | Clinton, NC 28328 | $522,238 |
39 | Robersonville Ag LLC | Robersonville, NC 27871 | $518,436 |
40 | Cottle Farms Inc | Faison, NC 28341 | $503,409 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”